As a number of states push forward with initiatives to change the way alimony is awarded, observers in New York and other states are discussing the possible benefits or drawbacks of such reforms. Critics of current spousal support laws say that many individuals are unfairly saddled with orders to provide lifetime alimony to former husbands or wives, orders that can be difficult to modify even after the paying spouse becomes unemployed or experiences a drastic life change.

Those lobbying for a reconsideration of alimony laws claim that current legislation was created during a time when women were expected not to seek employment, putting them at risk for severe economic repercussions in the event of a divorce. They assert that alimony laws must be brought into alignment with modern marriage and reduce the frequency of lifetime awards to spouses who can support themselves.

Critics of the proposed reforms say that eliminating permanent alimony could hurt divorcees who depend on spousal support to survive. One divorce financial strategist from New York said he was concerned that alimony reform could cause "unintended consequences," warning that he thought there could be more women living in poverty if changes are made.

Other experts worry that new laws would give judges less discretion in cases where one spouse clearly needs more support following a divorce. One attorney and law professor said that a law defined by that treats everyone equally according to arbitrary guidelines could cause spouses to remain in abusive relationships in order to qualify for more eventual support.

And until any changes are made to New York law, those who believe they pay too much or those who think they receive too little alimony should consult with an experienced family law attorney in an attempt to receive a modification of payments.

Source: USA Today, "Should alimony laws be changed?," Yamiche Alcindor, Jan. 19, 2012